Re: A Fresh Look at Accommodating Cognitive Disabilities

There is a large body of work on graphic communication - people use it in
places like airports, space stations, instruction manuals, and so
forth. I have not looked for this kind of work on the Web, but Art Libraries
often have heaps of books on it (I read a very nice one recently, from the
60's but well thought-out, clearly and helpfully illustrated, and mostly
relevant today - these things change, just as verbal alnguage does).
Charles McCN
On 2000年5月10日, Anne Pemberton wrote:
 At 10:37 AM 5/10/2000 -0400, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:
 >Do you know if there are any guidelines to do a visual alternative for text?
 
 Marja, 
 
 	If there are such guidelines, other than in book/magazine/newspaper
 publishing, I'm not aware of them. Textbooks, early reading books and many
 hardbound books for any age seem to follow guidelines that dictate the
 amount of text and/or visuals per page. Magazines and newspapers seem to
 follow guidelines, perhaps ones common in their field/for a similar
 audience. Encyclopedia are typically well illustrated, and are most
 hard-bound dictionaries include drawings for words that are specific, such
 as a type of animal or object. Publication guidelines probably do not
 address "cogntive disabilities" as such, but tend to include these folks in
 their attempt to reach their widest audience.
 
 	Of course, television has visuals for almost everything they broadcast no
 matter how abstract. 
 
 					Anne
 
 
 Anne L. Pemberton
 http://www.pen.k12.va.us/Pav/Academy1
 http://www.erols.com/stevepem/Homeschooling
 apembert@crosslink.net
 Enabling Support Foundation
 http://www.enabling.org
 
--
Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia 

Received on Saturday, 27 May 2000 11:33:03 UTC

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /