- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 15:27:46 -0500
- To: "'Jonathan Chetwynd'" <jay@peepo.com>, "'w3c'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <001501bf9ce1$e8eec5006234ドルf018@compaqm700>
Jonathan I don't understand. Are you saying that sites like this http://www.peepo.com/drivethru5/) and woodcutter are what your talking about as being what we should target? For example: Is this what you think the W3C WCAG website should look like to be more accessible to people with cognitive disabilities? I'm sure that's not what you mean - but I don't know what you do mean. Could you help me. I am confused as to what we are discussing. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/ FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Chetwynd Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2000 11:20 AM To: love26@gorge.net; w3c Subject: Re: woodcutter perhaps if you prefer a less acidic experience http://www.peepo.com/drivethru5/ fits the bill. It's about a year old but still functions just. The graphics leave rather a lot to the imagination. jay@peepo.com special needs teacher web accessibility consultant
Received on Sunday, 2 April 2000 16:28:59 UTC