- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 00:02:03 -0500 (EST)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- cc: "'WAI GL'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "JudyBrewer (E-mail)" <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0004020001070.11714-100000@tux.w3.org>
Hi Gregg, yes, I think there is more that could be done. I would call a group for such tools Evaluation and Reapiar Tools *grin*. And I would encourage them to work with the RDF interest group - I think they have some of the key pieces already. Cheers Charles On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: HI Charles Yes we do have much of the markup. (Nice summary) And there are some cognitive browsers. But have we exhausted out creativity in making browsers that take advantage of this markup? I don't think so. I think we could do much more. (You probably do to from your notes). It would be interesting to create a new working group - I'll call it the User Tools Group. It would look at how special browsers or extensions to existing browsers could be developed which would make existing content more accessible. This is beyond what we would expect from all browsers (UA). This could then be followed with more or better suggestions for markup. Although Markup will have to take on a new meaning with the media and content types we will be seeing in the future. Gregg -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Sunday, 2 April 2000 00:02:12 UTC