- From: John Boyer <jboyer@PureEdge.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 08:36:51 -0700
- To: "Juergen Brauckmann" <brauckmann@trustcenter.de>, "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BFEDKCINEPLBDLODCODKOEOKCEAA.jboyer@PureEdge.com>
Hi Juergen, The algorithm identifier for C14N with comments is different. It is http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xml-c14n-20000907#WithComments This is reflected in the editors' copies I posted (see the archives), and will be present in the next rev of the WD. Thanks, John Boyer -----Original Message----- From: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Juergen Brauckmann Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 12:31 AM To: IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG Subject: xml_dsig, C14N and comments Hi. Two questions: 1. How can I know as an implementor of xml_dsig whether a canonicalization or transform with algorithm <http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xml-c14n-20000907> was done with or without comments? 2. Consider the following example: <Signature xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/07/xmldsig#"> <SignedInfo> ..... <Reference URI="#Stuff"> <Transforms> <Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xml-c14n-20000907" /> </Transforms> .... </Reference> </SignedInfo> ... <Object Id="Stuff"> <MyOwn> <Additional></Additional> </MyOwn> </Object> </Signature> Are the elements of Object treated as #PCDATA, or do I have to apply C14N? Regards, Juergen
Received on Friday, 8 September 2000 11:45:02 UTC