Re: Valid XML and Schema Normative?

At 12:52 2000年07月06日 -0400, Ken Goldman wrote:
 >Could you give an XML snippet of this, showing the issue?
Assuming that the following well formed XML instance reference 
and signature validates, is the following example a valid 
Signature? (It violates the specified content model).
I'm slightly confusing the syntactical violation with a clear violation
of semantics ("disclaimer") just to show why this might be important, 
but [x01-03] could be any name space qualified and wellformed XML.
 [s01] <Signature Id="MyFirstSignature" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#"> 
 [s02] <SignedInfo> 
 [x01] <disclaimer xmlns="http://badactor.com/2000/v3">
 [x02] <declaration>this signature is invalid on tuesdays</declaration>
 [x03] </disclaimer>
 [s03] <CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xml-c14n-20000119"/> 
 [s04] <SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#dsa-sha1"/> 
 [s05] <Reference URI="http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xhtml1-20000126/"> 
 [s06] <Transforms> 
 [s07] <Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xml-c14n-20000119"/> 
 [s08] </Transforms> 
 [s09] <DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#sha1"/> 
 [s10] <DigestValue>j6lwx3rvEPO0vKtMup4NbeVu8nk=</DigestValue> 
 [s11] </Reference> 
 [s12] </SignedInfo> 
 [s13] <SignatureValue>MC0CFFrVLtRlk=...</SignatureValue> 
 [s14] <KeyInfo> 
 [s15a] <KeyValue>
 [s15b] <DSAKeyValue> 
 [s15c] <P>...</P><Q>...</Q><G>...</G><Y>...</Y> 
 [s15d] </DSAKeyValue> 
 [s15e] </KeyValue> 
 [s16] </KeyInfo> 
 [s17] </Signature>
_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr. 
W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/

Received on Thursday, 6 July 2000 13:10:30 UTC

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /