- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: 2018年2月22日 14:40:25 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Message-ID: <04a90fe1-0210-757f-6bbf-0dca4a03e77b@dbooth.org>
[Off list] +1 On 02/22/2018 10:47 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > > Technically the Semantic Web Interest Group is out of charter and this > list is not governed by W3C Process (its members never clicked through > any agreements), but yes - Harry, no need for personal attacks here, > rules or no rules. I can also sympathize with those who have been on the > receiving end of Sarven's tireless advocacy. This has been a tension > point around Semantic Web more or less since academia noticed RDF in > 2001 or so, which was also roughly when 'Semantic Web' was claimed as a > slogan by communities for whom the 'Web' part was largely an > after-thought rather than foundational. Many working in academia feel > very constrained by processes and workflows beyond their control, and > publicly shaming those who are entangled with PDFs (and closed > publishing) may not be the most constructive way to move things along. > Discussions here work best when we can avoid us-and-them-ism and focus > on common ground and interests. Phrased differently, and less > aggressively/personally, Harry's point about mathematical markup could > have been a foundation for collaboration rather than fight-winning (as > could some of Sarven's critiques too). > > Dan > > > On 22 Feb 2018 06:20, "Coralie Mercier" <coralie@w3.org > <mailto:coralie@w3.org>> wrote: > > Dear Harry, all, > > On this matter as well as all others we are debating passionately, > it's important to uphold the Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct > [1] that is in effect. It calls for civil discussion, for > communicating constructively, offering objective work criticism, > etc. This is the standard of conversation we expect and are serious > about. > > Section 3.1 "Individual Participation Criteria" of the W3C Process > Document [2] reminds that > {{ > Participants in any W3C activity must abide by the terms and spirit > of the W3C Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct [...] > }} > > Thank you, > Coralie Mercier, Head of W3C Marketing & Communications > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/ > <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/> > [2] https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#ParticipationCriteria > <https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#ParticipationCriteria> > > > On 2018年2月21日 17:57:05 +0000, Harry Halpin > <hhalpin@ibiblio.org <mailto:hhalpin@ibiblio.org>> wrote: > > > > As I have pointed out many times, [...] > > So I basically consider it a solvable problem > > that requires real work, but until I see real work I consider > Sarven’s > > posts to basically be pointless spam and borderline trolling. > > > > Since I have no desire to see spam in my inbox, I will > unsubscribe from > > this mailing list quite shortly likely. > > -- > Coralie Mercier - W3C Marketing & Communications - https://www.w3.org > mailto:coralie@w3.org <mailto:coralie@w3.org> +337 810 795 22 > <tel:%2B337%20810%20795%2022> https://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/ > <https://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/> > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2018 19:40:57 UTC