- From: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
- Date: 2014年2月20日 14:44:05 -0500
- To: Ghislain Auguste Atemezing <Auguste.Atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- Cc: SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <F831482B-6A9B-4E11-9534-1E9F8B6476E5@3roundstones.com>
Hi Ghis, Can you be a bit more specific? Are you looking for evaluation criteria? There is of course basic vocabulary considerations aimed at helping people review a vocabulary to evaluate its usefulness in the Best Practices document but presumably you're looking for more or something different?? [1] There is a growing collection of Linked Data books (for developers, execs & academics), including code examples at the Linked Data Developer community site.[2] Two additional books are being added to the site this week. Perhaps you can find further guidance in these publications. Chapter 6 of the Linked Data book (Wood, Zaidman, Ruth) has detailed practical advice on embedding RDFa using Good Relations, FOAF, etc. Cheers, Bernadette [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-bp/#VOCABULARIES [2] http://linkeddatadeveloper.com On Feb 20, 2014, at 5:25 AM, Ghislain Atemezing <Auguste.Atemezing@eurecom.fr> wrote: > Hi all, > > [ Just before I continue ォ googling サ, could anyone help me with this naive question on ontology (reuse) evaluation ] > > How do you (we) evaluate ontology reuse choices in real-world scenarios? Any help, insights, pointers would be more than appreciated . > > Thanks in advance, > > Ghislain > > > ------------- > Ghislain Atemezing > EURECOM, Multimedia Communication Department > Campus SophiaTech > 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France > email: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com > Tel: +33 (0)4- 9300 8178 > Fax: +33 (0)4- 9000 8200 > Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin > > >
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 19:44:29 UTC