Re: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison

Martin, 
I must admit I did not follow all the intricacies of the relative URI->full URI conversion, I usually rely on library functions (I know, I am lazy). But if what you say below is true, isn't that a bug in the microdata spec?
Ivan
On Oct 29, 2011, at 11:26 , Martin Hepp wrote:
> Dear all:
> 
> We had a longer discussion on URI comparison in RDF settings earlier this year. Note that when it comes to writing Microdata parsers, which will be a common thing for LOD architectures, there is a new spec to observe:
> 
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/urls.html#resolve-a-url
> 
> AFAIK, itemtype URIs are never resolved this way, but itemprop and href URIs will.
> 
> This may result to different behaviors of queries in RDF settings if the same markup is used in Microdata vs. RDFa.
> 
> Best
> 
> Martin Hepp
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> martin hepp
> e-business & web science research group
> universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
> 
> e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
> phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
> fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
> www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
> http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
> skype: mfhepp 
> twitter: mfhepp
> 
> Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
> =================================================================
> * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Attachments

• application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s