Re: LOD Cloud Cache Stats

On 4/6/11 5:08 PM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
>
> Context infidelity == you are shifting the landscape that define
> the rules of the conversation I was trying to have.
>
>
> Yes, I'm trying to shift the collective conversation around the LOD 
> Cloud to recognize and include the idea, which really ought to be 
> fairly uncontroversial, that quantity and quality are intertwined. 
> Verbosely reified CSV cells, as William noted, are a particularly 
> obvious example: they increase the number of triples out of proportion 
> to their usefulness.
>
> If you don't want to participate in this part of the conversation, 
> don't. It's a public forum, nobody owns "the context". Until some more 
> people weigh in, I don't have any idea what "the list" (or, in this 
> case, the three lists) cares about. Raw scale? Accuracy? User 
> experience? Nine other things we haven't even mentioned? None of this?
Create a new conversation and then you own the context.
This is my last reply.
-- 
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen 
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen