Re: RDF URI References

• From: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
• Date: 2010”N11ŒŽ04“ú 14:03:40 +0000
• To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>
• CC: nathan@webr3.org, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4CD2BD3C.3040003@mac.com>

On 04/11/10 14:00, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> Le 04/11/2010 14:54, Nathan a écrit :
>> Makes sense, so, many recent docs, formal and informal, mention
>> explicitly "URI Reference" rather than "RDF URI Reference", "URI" or
>> "IRI" - for future docs which term should be used?
>
> I guess IRI should be the best choice. BTW, the OWL 2 specifications
> exclusively rely on IRIs in place where OWL 1 was using URIs and URI
> references.
+1.
SPARQL uses IRI [1]
Damian
[1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#QSynIRI>

Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 14:04:30 UTC