- From: Mischa Tuffield <mmt04r@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: 2010年5月29日 18:35:08 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>, semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|ebfc2e93542267e0f3f7e2b14e28243dm4SIaU06mmt04r|ecs.soton.ac.uk|71C72565-E>
Was just thinking that... I for one don't care for, or want to hear anything about software patents. Happy weekend people, Mischa Sent on the move On May 29, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Story Henry > <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: >> >> On 29 May 2010, at 13:34, Peng HaiJie wrote: >> >>>>> >>>> It's the linked data piece that is the most important >>>> contribution of the semantic web, and there it certainly does >>>> help to have standard representations (plural: rdf/xml, rdf, >>>> turtle,...) to represent the same distributed graphs. It just >>>> avoids having to re-invent the wheel. >>>> >>> I thought that a novel personal information management tool might >>> be the most important contribution of the linked data. A PCT >>> patent application(http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wads.jsp?IA=CN2008001969&LANGUAGE=EN&ID=id00000008443174&VOL=93&DOC=04b526&WO=09/086730&WEEK=29/2009&TYPE=A1&DOC_TYPE=PAMPH&PAGE=1 >>> ) describes such a PIM tool, but the original application files >>> are writen in chinese. If you were interested in it,please give me >>> your mailbox, I will send you the english version of specification. >> >> Is it possible to summarise what they think they have invented? > > While I understand the interest, with a SWIG chairing hat on, I > recommend that participants here do not dissect patents and patent > applications on this list. > > Many thanks, > > Dan >
Received on Saturday, 29 May 2010 17:37:07 UTC