- From: Chris Dollin <chris.dollin@epimorphics.com>
- Date: 2010年5月19日 15:38:59 +0100
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-Id: <201005191538.59931.chris.dollin@epimorphics.com>
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 01:39:52 pm Jitao Yang wrote: > Dear all, > > In reference to http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/, > suppose we define: > "... the formula DescPr(*d, p, o*) , asserting that object o is a value of > property p in description *d*. ..." > > and we have: > DescPr(*d, p, o*) > DescPr(*d', p, o'*) > > the above formula could be represented by RDF like: > > :d > a :DescPr_description ; > :has_property :p . > > :d' > a :DescPr_description ; > :has_property :p . > > :p > a :DescPr_property ; > :has_value :o ; > :has_value :o' . > > >From these triples how can we go back in a unique way to the logical > representation. I don't think you can, and I think that's because it's not a good representation (and vice-versa). I wasn't sure which bit of http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/ you were comparing/contrasting to. -- RDF is not /the/ answer. RDF is /an/ answer. - Arcadian Epimorphics Ltd Registered address: C/O Robson Taylor, Froomsgate House, Bristol Registered number: 7016688
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 14:40:54 UTC