- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 08:05:36 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20100706080536.623d9c97@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:43:17 -0500 Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > Well, nobody is suggesting allowing literals as predicates (although > in fact the RDF semantics would easily extend to this usage, if > required, and the analogous structures are allowed, and do have > genuine use cases, in ISO Common Logic.) Actually, I have suggested allowing them just to make things simpler - URIs, blank nodes and literals would all be allowed in any position. However, a statement with a literal in the predicate position would be officially defined to have no meaning. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 07:06:50 UTC