- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: 2010年1月14日 17:35:26 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd1001140835t7d42856jaca7c69b843096d6@mail.gmail.com>
2010年1月14日 Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>: > A lot, perhaps all, of this hair could be avoided if RDF allowed general > tuples as well as triples. All that is needed is some way to put N things > into a sequence: so, put N things into a sequence. The 'graph model' would > be a hyperlink, drawn as a polygon (eg triangle for N=3) rather than a line. > In triples-style syntax, it would just be moving a dot. Don't think I fully understand what you have in mind, are you talking: <s> <p> <x, y, z> (which is kinda supported already with turtle syntax) or <s> <p1,x> <p2,y> <p3,z> (which is also kinda supported already, albeit lengthy) or something else? n-tuples would certainly have the advantage of mapping more directly to SQL-style data Cheers, Danny.
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 16:36:01 UTC