- From: Michael Zeltner <mzeltner@netalleynetworks.com>
- Date: 2005年7月23日 11:41:17 +0200
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-Id: <D0C39437-A719-42BD-9315-C9C607BC1A07@netalleynetworks.com>
Am 22.07.2005 um 00:40 schrieb Danny Ayers: > mod_enclosure [1] starts with: > > <enc:enclosure rdf:resource="http://foo.bar/baz.mp3" > enc:type="audio/mpeg" enc:length="65535"/> Interesting, thanks. I only saw the enclosures in RSS 1.0 used like your example from http://dannyayers.com/archives/2004/11/01/rss-10- enclosures/ hence my complaint. Glad to see I wasn't the only one thinking of that solution. > So I think we're probably stuck with it for another year or two yet. Sadly. Maybe we can get the process to accelerate a bit through just using RSS 1.0 enclosures in our feeds, while trying to get them into iTunes. Once iTunes supports it, everyone will probably going to implement it too. Hm. > But it's not all bad news, I think 'simple' RSS in the wild has been > getting progressively cleaner. I imagine the desire for people to get > their material on iTunes and to aggregate Yahoo! Media RSS will act as > fairly powerful validation processes for RSS+Media XML. If the XML is > half-decent, RDF is but a stylesheet away. I'm probably too idealistic with wanting it to work without hassle :) Thanks Danny for your reply, and Karl thanks for forwarding this question to this mailinglist. Obviously, I'm not much of a mailinglist person ;) Regards, Michael -- Michael Zeltner Netalley Networks LLP http://www.netalleynetworks.com/
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2005 12:25:42 UTC