- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:20:08 +0000
- To: "jaiprakash.singh@adminre.co.uk" <jaiprakash.singh@adminre.co.uk>, "public-comments-wcag20@w3.org" <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C08FF7B1-F02A-4399-8CAD-A327CDBB4813@adobe.com>
Thanks for the comment. We changed the reference to 1.2.4 - thanks. https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commit/273c0b22f1005e78006a696072b4fcb63dadf4df?diff=split Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk On 1/6/17, 08:34, "noreply@w3.org" <noreply@w3.org> wrote: >Name: Jai Prakash Singh >Email: jaiprakash.singh@adminre.co.uk >Affiliation: >Document: UW >Item Number: Appendix A: How to refer to WCAG 2.0 from other documents >Part of Item: Examples >Comment Type: question >Summary of Issue: Seeks clarification on a statement >Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): >Under the heading: "Example of use of a WCAG reference in a "shall or must" statement", >There is a statement: "Level A Success Criteria plus Success Criteria 1.2.3," >Query: 1.2.3 is also Level A. > > > >Proposed Change: >Either 1.2.3 is not Level A or wrong section has been indicated in the statement. >
Received on Friday, 6 January 2017 14:20:51 UTC