public-comments-wcag20@w3.org from January 2008: by subject

1.4.5 wording can use some improvement

20 hour exception is too long for secure sessions dealing with identification and financial information and services

200% seems too ambitious

5 is too much and miss of exceptions

About unique link names

Absence of a success criterion that covers the absence of support for scripting or programmatic objects

Absence of mention of XHTML whenever HTML is used for referring to Web page markup

Absence of success criterion for deprecated and obsolete features

Absence of success criterion for markup/properties that prevent configuring pages/interfaces to meet accessibility needs

accessibility of social networking site content

accessibility supported definition and concept is confusing

achieving all or one ?

Additional failure technique needed

Additional requirement for contrast controls

alternative to text with external text ?

block sizing with absolute unit and text sizing with relative unit

Bypass Blocks confusing

Change SC level for flashing content

Changing SC for re-authentication after time limit expiration

color and pattern for background-image too ?

Components do not have \"sensory\" characteristics but just attributes or characteristics.

Concern about providing an alt version of readable content

Conformance Level wrong

contrast control available on or from the page

Cross reference for SC of different conformance level

Currently not addressed: Background images disappear with user-specific colors

double negative in the essential exception

Drafting of SC does not convey intent. Not clear.

EOWG's replies to WCAG WG resolutions of EOWG comments on May 2007 Draft of WCAG 2.0

Essential Exception

Example \"A help dialog ...\"

Geberal Advice is listed as a failure

How to decide wether it is \"large scale text\" or not

HTML Version of Understanding WCAG with semantic classes and IDs

Information on current location conformance level change

Is it proven that the new algorithm for calculating brightness is superior to the old one?

labels and headings definition not sufficient

lists for accessibility supported technologies

Making links visually distinct

meaning of accessibility supported unclear

meaningful and logical sequence

Media exemption to 1.1.1

Minimum contrast needed for default layout in case 1.4.3 is met via a contrast control

missing situation

Missing Success Criteria - Acronyms

paragraph spacing is larger than line spacing

Potential consequences of success criterion 3.2.5 are too severe for \"AAA\"

problem with example of change of context

Provide a quick reference for web designer

provide greater support for people with cognitive, language or reading difficulties

Provide no keyboard trap information in context

Reference to \"users with disabilities\" in appropriate

Refering to \"users\" vs. \"users with disabilities\"

SC 1.4.5 unclear

scaling of line-height and containers-heights

Space missing in \"visuallycustomized\" of the \"Customizable\" list item.

Step backwards from WCAG 1.0?

technical terms definition and example

Technique G142 Insufficient

Test

The subject here does not affect an content author.

Unclear wording of Sufficient Technique H73

Unnecessary extra Principle 4

Use of \"disability\" instead of \"impairment\".

very similar in color to the body text condition

WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission

When is a change of content a change of context

Why do contrast requirements not apply to lines in diagrams and such?

Why the exception for proper names and technical terms?

Word \"Essential\" is confusing

Word \"limited\" is confusing

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2008 21:50:14 UTC