Need Bullets for Educational Testing Situations WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 February)
a small usability enhancement to the guidelines document Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 19 February)
Progress Bar WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 15 February)
Re: EOWG's replies to WCAG WG resolutions of EOWG comments on May 2007 Draft of WCAG 2.0 Loretta Guarino Reid (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: EOWG's replies to WCAG WG resolutions of EOWG comments on May 2007 Draft of WCAG 2.0 Loretta Guarino Reid (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: EOWG's replies to WCAG WG resolutions of EOWG comments on May 2007 Draft of WCAG 2.0 Loretta Guarino Reid (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: EOWG's replies to WCAG WG resolutions of EOWG comments on May 2007 Draft of WCAG 2.0 Wayne Dick (Saturday, 9 February)
- Re: EOWG's replies to WCAG WG resolutions of EOWG comments on May 2007 Draft of WCAG 2.0 Wayne Dick (Saturday, 9 February)
Re: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 1: H34 example source direction Loretta Guarino Reid (Thursday, 7 February)
Is \"Prior warning\" really OK here? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: HTML Version of Understanding WCAG with semantic classes and IDs Ben Caldwell (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: HTML Version of Understanding WCAG with semantic classes and IDs Michael Stenitzer (Thursday, 7 February)
Programmatically determine the role not explained WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 4 February)
Failure does not fail in Firefox WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 4 February)
Technique also works in Firefox WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 4 February)
Version numbers should be added for Firefox WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 4 February)
Hard to accomplish the examples in 3 seconds WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 4 February)
Mouse hover and focus not equivalent WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 4 February)
Links ot ARIA out of date WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 4 February)
Example Doc is XHTML, not HTML WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 4 February)
Updated testing to allow Dojo WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 4 February)
Links to How to Meet SC WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 4 February)
Re: WCAG 2.0: Accessibility supported technologies Shadi Abou-Zahra (Monday, 4 February)
Not testable WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 4 February)
RE: headings and which SC? Patrick Lauke (Monday, 4 February)
Change \"accessibility supported\" to \"accessibility-supporting\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Add header to first page WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Add header to first page WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
\"Item Number\': Abstract. clarify with commas WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Link \'metadata\' WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Remove rationale from Guideine 1.1 text WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Clarify what \'which is optional\' applies to WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
changes of context definition WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Typos in Programmatically determiend WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
List all contributors to WCAG 2.0 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Consider title change WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Allow users to filter out HTML techniques WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Introduction, second part, trim wording WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Introduction, first part, trim wording WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
web page example 4 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
user interface component - missing comma WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
viewport - awkard WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
synchronised media - awkard WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
supplemental content WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
set of Web pages - unnecessarily convoluted WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
set of Web pages - clarify WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
role WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
real-time event WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
programmatically determiend - typo WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
programmatically determined / programmatically determinable WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
non-text content WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
non-text content WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
navigated sequentially WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
general flash and red threshold - confusing jargon? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
flash WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
extended audio - clarification in note WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
contrast ratio - generalised copy WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
How to create the documented lists WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
80 characters WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Text of Image WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
Visually customizable text WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
WCAG 2.0 should advance to Candidate Recommendation WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 2 February)
I think I may have answered my own question... WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Can \"conforming alternate versions\" be objects on a page? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Suggestions to clarify \"media alternatives to text\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Comments from Eric Hansen on the 17 Dec 2007 draft of WCAG 2.0 Hansen, Eric (Friday, 1 February)
Failure F70 Does not Prohibit Duplicate Attributes Christophe Strobbe (on behalf of BenToWeb) (Friday, 1 February)
SC 3.3.1: Providing client-side validation and adding error text via the DOM (future technique ) Christophe Strobbe (on behalf of BenToWeb) (Friday, 1 February)
SC 3.1.3: Glossary without Links Should Fail? Christophe Strobbe (on behalf of BenToWeb) (Friday, 1 February)
Language Subtags (Techniques H57 and H58) Christophe Strobbe (on behalf of BenToWeb) (Friday, 1 February)
contrast algorithm for 1.4.3: Contrast (Minimum) Christophe Strobbe (on behalf of BenToWeb) (Friday, 1 February)
G14: Does example 2 fail the success criterion? Christophe Strobbe (on behalf of BenToWeb) (Friday, 1 February)
H36: Using alt attributes on images used as submit buttons Christophe Strobbe (on behalf of BenToWeb) (Friday, 1 February)
Consistent Presentation (SC 3.2.3) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
G 3.1 covers perceivability as well as understandability WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
section headings (SC 2.4.10) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
descriptive labels (SC 2.4.6) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
purpose of each link (SC 2.4.4) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
descriptive titles (SC 2.4.2) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
understand the speech (SC 1.4.7) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
understand the speech output (SC 1.4.2) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
usable default presentation (G 1.4) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
meaningful sequence (SC 1.3.2) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
a voice easy to understand (G 1.1) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
clarification of the term \'understandable\' WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
clarification of the term \'perceivable\' WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
conforming alternative version - awkward wording WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
captions - awkward wording WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
blink vs flash WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
assistive technology - stray word WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
activity where moving, blinking... WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
accessibility supported - users\' assistive technologies WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
stray word in accessibility supported WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
immediately? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
both cases - awkward WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
abbreviation refers to \"organization\"? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
awkward phrasing WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Contrast ratio (on text edges) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Accessibility supported (lists of Web technologies) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Conformance and use of accessibility-supported tehcnologies in a non-conforming way WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Use of roles with current technologies WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Sections Headings conformance level WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Sequential navigation and meaning WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
User agents\' incorrect behaviour while navigating sequentially WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Criteria to evaluate essential things WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Concerns about text resizing requirements WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Conformance level too low WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Concerns about 80 characters width limit WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
non w3c techiques have to be named with clear examples WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
non w3c techiques have to be named with clear examples WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
2.4.10 aa instead of aaa WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
2.4.8 AA instead of AAA WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
2.2.2 - how to handle advertisements WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
1.4.4 - 200% is too high WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
1.4.3 - 5:1 too high WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
1.2 exceptions needed WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
1.2 - terminology not clear WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
1.2.2 not realistic WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
1.2.1 not realistic WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
It is unclear if this SC is testable. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Several Success Criteria include specific values WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
clarify keyboard shortcut WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
add image map example WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Add image map example WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Image map text alternative WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Add image map example WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Level A for low or no-contrast content WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Optional components and the hint of metadata WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
\"Awkward wording WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Sufficient techniques seems to contradict other areas and principles. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
\"well formed\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
ambiguous if not clear from context already? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
so headings are optional then at anything below AAA? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
dependent on UA? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
sweeping generalisation? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
flashing dependent on size? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
flashing dependent on size, but not specified! WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
arbitrary values? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
\"with disabilities\", take two WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
\"with disabilities\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
what if it\'s not the author\'s fault? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
line spacing WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
aligned on both left and right WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
80 characters? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Clarification of advisory techniques WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Clarification of note / awkward phrasing WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Awkward wording WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Add reference to 1.4.1 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Add reference to 1.2.1 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Missing full stop WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Missing full stop WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Metadata sentence right at the end WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
\"Webmasters\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Combine \"usable in general\" and \"older individuals\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 1 February)
Last message date: Friday, 29 February 2008 22:22:59 UTC