- From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:17:36 +1000
- To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <008001c7bfe92ドルe28f5f0$b300a8c0@tkhcomputer>
Wouldn't "common failures" be an example of things one should not do? That seems to be a perfect place for these kind of examples and have been used throughout the document -----Original Message----- From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com] Sent: Saturday, 7 July 2007 12:18 AM To: Gian Sampson-Wild Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org Subject: Re: Comment LC-1130 This comment referred to "SC 3.2.1: When any component receives focus, it does not cause a change of context." Loretta On 7/6/07, Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au> wrote: > Comment 103: > > Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f931ドルb504e09288ドルb23a@tkhcomputer > (Issue ID: LC-1130) > > Needs more examples > > ---------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > ---------------------------- > > This success criterion requires that you not do something. We don't provide > examples of things not to do because they can be misunderstood as examples > of how to conform. We tried to think of positive examples of thing to do > that didn't violate the provision but that was pretty much anything. We have > provided one. If you can think of another positive example (not an example > of a failure) we would be happy to include it as well. > ---------------------------- > Response from GSW: > ---------------------------- > Can you please remind me what SC this comment was referring to? > >
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 16:17:50 UTC