- From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:08:02 +1000
- To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <003801c7bfd7149ドルee520$b300a8c0@tkhcomputer>
Comment 74: Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f931ドルb504e09288ドルb23a@tkhcomputer (Issue ID: LC-1101) Examples: The example in SC 2.3.1 (Level 1) specifies two lightning flashes, whereas the example in SC 2.3.3 (Level 3) specifies three lightning flashes. A level 3 SC should have less flash than a Level 1 SC Proposed Change: Rewrite the examples or the SC ---------------------------- Response from Working Group: ---------------------------- Good catch. The example for SC 2.3.1 has been rewritten as two examples. One with flashing in a small area, and one that matches the SC 2.3.2 example to show that using the tighter SC 2.3.2 criterion is sufficient for Level A. The new SC 2.3.1 example reads: "Example 1: Web site has video of muzzle flash of machine gun fire but limits the size of the flashing image to a small portion of the screen below the flash threshold size." ---------------------------- Response from GSW: ---------------------------- Thank you for addressing my comment
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 14:08:16 UTC