- From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 01:29:57 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20060505012957.4E420BDA7@w3c4.w3.org>
Name: Jason White Email: jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au Affiliation: none Document: W2 Item Number: (none selected) Part of Item: Comment Type: GE Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): Terminology used in related technical specifications should be consistent, unless there are compelling reasons to the contrary. There are no strong reasons why basic terminology in WCAG 2.0 should differ from ATAG, UAAG and indeed WCAG 1.0. Proposed Change: Change \"principles\", \"guidelines\" and \"success criteria\", respectively, to \"guidelines\", \"checkpoints\" and \"provisions\" throughout WCAG 2.0 and supporting documentation.
Received on Friday, 5 May 2006 01:30:15 UTC