Re: wordsmithing priority

On 9 December 2014 at 09:42, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote:
> more flexible expressions of priority. Idle streams begin with a default
> priority (Section 5.3.5)."
https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/670
Because I'm nice.
> I propose just editing out the first sentence:
>
> "If a PRIORITY frame is received with a stream identifier of 0x0, the
> recipient MUST respond with a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of
> type PROTOCOL_ERROR."
I didn't go that far, but you should take a look at my last email and
PR #669. We had a mid-air collision on this very point.

Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2014 17:53:34 UTC

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /