Re: Improving the state machine

On 27 November 2014 at 09:28, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> But other than than old lost battle.... I think the send/recv
> clarifications are good ones. Not such a big fan of the use of the word
> "either", which looks like it applies to the frame type and not to the send
> or recv. Maybe "send/recv" would be better than "either".
> ​​
>
>
I agree, the word "either" isn't great. Since the space in the diagram is
so limited, I'd be tempted to suggest symbols for send/recv/both. However
that would get messy fast.
Why not leave out the "either", and reorder the two ambigious cases: "R /
send ES", "R / recv ES" ?
If that's too finicky, this PR is still an improvement.
-- 
 Matthew Kerwin
 http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/