Re: position on changing defaults?

emacs-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: position on changing defaults?

From: Dan Nicolaescu

Subject: Re: position on changing defaults?

Date: 2008年3月08日 16:27:55 -0800

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
 > address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
 > 
 > > Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
 > >
 > >> Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
 > >>
 > >>> That's only if blahblah matches an existing buffer, if it does not, it
 > >>> will create a new buffer.
 > >>
 > >> One more reason not to use it.
 > >
 > > With ido-mode, you type C-x b blablabla C-j y RET to create a new buffer.
 > > I guess it's the same with iswitchb.
 > 
 > I use scratch buffers quite often, anything that requires more than C-x
 > b x RET to go to buffer x would not be acceptable for me.
The fact that you need to type C-j instead of RET when creating a buffer
does not seem such a huge imposition, it if makes selecting buffers much
easier for everyone else (assuming we don't find a better solution).
Creating non-file backed buffers is not something that is that frequent
for most users, and frankly probably not so desirable for newbies
(There's so much trouble with the *scratch* buffer anyway...)

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]

Re: position on changing defaults?, (continued)
- Re: position on changing defaults? , Chong Yidong, 2008年03月05日
  - Re: position on changing defaults? , Juri Linkov, 2008年03月05日

Prev by Date: Re: position on changing defaults?
Next by Date: Re: Diffs between %s and %s end here
Previous by thread: Re: ido-mode
Next by thread: Re: position on changing defaults?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread