Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Sign up

How to make "Hot Water: Boiler control entity" for Viessmann Vitocal 252-A with Viessmann ViCare HA integration #601

Answered by traktore-org
tlinnet asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

Hi,
I am new to SEM, and trying to configure it.

I have a Viessmann Vitocal 252-A. I have the HA integration Viessmann ViCare.

I exposes these Configurations.
image

  • Activate one-time charge
  • Deactivate one-time charge

And sensor:

  • One-time charge
image

But SEM expects a Switch / Boolean as input:

image

I tried making a helper:

image

And then some very simple automations:

image

That seems to work.
But what if I activate the option in the ViCare App. how can I make that state be reflected back to the helper Switch?

And to make things a bit more complicated, there is about 3-5 min delay between the activation of "(De)Activate one-time charge" in either HA or ViCare app, before the "One-time charge" Sensor picks it up.

You must be logged in to vote

Hi @tlinnet, welcome to SEM! 👋

Your instinct is right — SEM's Boiler control entity must be something SEM can turn_on / turn_off (a switch., water_heater., or climate. entity), and the ViCare integration only gives you two buttons plus a read‐only One‐time charge sensor. So you do need a bridge entity. The good news is you can make one that is bidirectional in a single helper, which solves your "what if I toggle it in the ViCare app?" question.

Use a Template switch (not an input_boolean helper)

Instead of an input_boolean + separate automations, use a template switch. It presses the ViCare buttons on turn_on/turn_off, and it derives its own state from the "One‐time charge" sensor — so it...

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

Hi @tlinnet, welcome to SEM! 👋

Your instinct is right — SEM's Boiler control entity must be something SEM can turn_on / turn_off (a switch., water_heater., or climate. entity), and the ViCare integration only gives you two buttons plus a read‐only One‐time charge sensor. So you do need a bridge entity. The good news is you can make one that is bidirectional in a single helper, which solves your "what if I toggle it in the ViCare app?" question.

Use a Template switch (not an input_boolean helper)

Instead of an input_boolean + separate automations, use a template switch. It presses the ViCare buttons on turn_on/turn_off, and it derives its own state from the "One‐time charge" sensor — so it reflects reality no matter who flipped it (HA, the ViCare app, or SEM itself):

# configuration.yaml
switch:
 - platform: template
 switches:
 boiler_one_time_charge:
 friendly_name: "Boiler one-time charge"
 # State comes from the ViCare sensor → reflects app changes automatically
 value_template: >
 {{ is_state('sensor.YOUR_DEVICE_one_time_charge', 'on') }}
 turn_on:
 - service: button.press
 target:
 entity_id: button.YOUR_DEVICE_activate_one_time_charge
 turn_off:
 - service: button.press
 target:
 entity_id: button.YOUR_DEVICE_deactivate_one_time_charge

Swap in your real entity IDs (if the "One‐time charge" sensor reports true/false instead of on/off, adjust the value_template accordingly). Then point SEM's Boiler control entity at switch.boiler_one_time_charge.

Because the state is driven by the sensor, when you activate one‐time charge in the ViCare app the template switch turns itself on with no extra automation — which is exactly what you were missing.

About the 3–5 min delay ⏱️

That lag is the ViCare cloud → HA reporting delay; nothing SEM (or the template switch) can shortcut. One thing worth knowing: SEM reads the control entity back each cycle to keep its belief in sync, and it corrects an "SEM turned it on but the entity still reads off" mismatch after a short grace window (~45 s), then applies a brief re‐activate cooldown. With a 3–5 min feedback delay, SEM may briefly conclude the boiler is off right after it commands it on, before the sensor catches up. In practice it converges once the sensor flips, but if you ever see SEM appear to "flip‐flop" the one‐time charge, that mismatch is the cause — let us know and we can look at making the grace window tolerant of slow‐reporting control entities.

Hope that helps — happy to refine the template if your sensor's states differ from the above. 🙂

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by tlinnet
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /