-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 888
-
What is the rationale for including esoteric yet rather basic trigonometry functions like Arcversine? These functions have the exact same implementation as one would write directly, therefore performance cannot be the motivation. Is it just a pure convenience?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
The motivation is straightforward: to name common mathematical expressions. That they are currently implemented according to textbook definitions (in most cases) is an implementation detail subject to change. For example, the error functions are an example where implementations do not follow textbook formulas. In the function, we may update the implementations for better accuracy, perf, or a combination of both, depending on time and funding.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
The motivation is straightforward: to name common mathematical expressions. That they are currently implemented according to textbook definitions (in most cases) is an implementation detail subject to change. For example, the error functions are an example where implementations do not follow textbook formulas. In the function, we may update the implementations for better accuracy, perf, or a combination of both, depending on time and funding.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
That makes sense. Thank you.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
👍 1