Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

simplicial complexes / "meshtypes" #29

Open
@mattdesl

Description

I think simplicial complexes are a good approach for modularity but they have some drawbacks:

  • "simplicial complex" is long-winded and intimidating; all of the search results related to it are extremely complex for somebody just trying to get a cube or sphere on screen
  • they generally don't provide 3D rendering features like UVs or normals (lighting/texturing)

I am experimenting with a torus-mesh module and it would be great to have UVs baked in (like in @TatumCreative's geo-3d-box). It would also be good to standardize naming (mesh.uvs, module name, etc).

Normals would also be handy. So far I am using normals and glsl-face-normal, which seems to work well. Are there instances where they might provide less than desirable results compared to using the normals generated with the mesh?

/cc @mikolalysenko @hughsk

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

        AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /