Inconsistent and Incorrect License Information Output in Parlay v0.8.0 #116

Hi @mcombuechen ,

I tested with Parlay v0.8.0 on the Cassandra image and observed that the previously reported issue #111 is no longer occurring. However, I did notice a few other inconsistencies in the license information:

• npn-boot: The correct license is Apache-2.0 & GPLv2 with Classpath Exception, but Parlay outputs (Apache-2.0 OR EPL-1.0 OR SSPL-1.0).
• istack-commons-runtime: The correct license is CDDL-1.1 or GPL-1.1, but Parlay does not provide any license information.

Additionally, some licenses are inconsistently formatted:

• License names are sometimes displayed in different variations, such as:
  --> (The Apache Software License OR Version 2.0)
  --> (---- Apache-2.0)
  --> (Apache License OR Version 2.0)
  --> (---- The Apache Software License OR Version 2.0)
  --> Expected format: Apache-2.0
• Some entries contain unclear placeholders, such as (--- []) and (---- Public Domain).
• Parlay does not follow a consistent pattern for certain licenses. For example:
  --> Some entries use LGPL-2.1+, while others display a long-form description:
  (GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License OR (at your option) any later version.)

Could Parlay standardize the license format to ensure consistency? Let me know if you need any additional details!

Thanks.