-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Pipeline Plan inline
Seth Ford edited this page Mar 2, 2026
·
10 revisions
Plan saved to docs/plans/2026-03-02-ping-command.md. Here's a summary:
4 files changed (2 created, 2 modified), 13 tasks.
Standalone script pattern — identical to sw-hello.sh. Rejected inline-in-router because it violates every established convention and can't be tested in isolation.
| Option | Trade-offs |
|---|---|
| Standalone script (chosen) | +Consistent, +Modular, +Testable. 3 files, minimal blast radius |
| Inline in router | -Inconsistent, -Untestable, -Mixes concerns. Rejected |
| Action | File |
|---|---|
| Create | scripts/sw-ping.sh |
| Create |
scripts/sw-ping-test.sh (6 tests) |
| Modify |
scripts/sw (add ping) case after hello)) |
| Modify |
package.json (add ping test to npm test chain) |
-
bash scripts/sw-ping.sh→ printspong, exits 0 -
bash scripts/sw-ping-test.sh→PASS: 6 FAIL: 0 -
bash scripts/sw ping→ printspong -
npm test→ all suites pass
- No ERR trap in test file (avoids false failures on expected non-zero exits)
-
((PASS++))pattern matchessw-hello-test.shexactly (bash 3.2 compatible) - Router case placed before
*)default
Plan complete and saved to docs/plans/2026-03-02-ping-command.md. Two execution options:
1. Subagent-Driven (this session) — I dispatch a fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration
2. Parallel Session (separate) — Open a new session with superpowers:executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints
Which approach?