-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Pipeline Plan inline
Seth Ford edited this page Mar 2, 2026
·
10 revisions
Plan complete and saved to docs/plans/2026-03-02-ping-command.md.
The plan adds the shipwright ping command in 4 files, 9 tasks:
| # | Task | File(s) |
|---|---|---|
| 1-2 | Create + chmod sw-ping.sh
|
scripts/sw-ping.sh (new) |
| 3-4 | Create + chmod sw-ping-test.sh
|
scripts/sw-ping-test.sh (new) |
| 5 | Run test in isolation — verify 6 PASS | — |
| 6 | Register ping) case in router |
scripts/sw |
| 7 | Add test to npm test chain |
package.json |
| 8 | Smoke-test via router | — |
| 9 | Commit | — |
Key decisions:
- Standalone script (not inline in router) — only approach consistent with all 100+ existing commands, independently testable
-
6 tests matching
sw-hello-test.shexactly: output match, exit code,--help,-h,--version, invalid option -
((PASS++))pattern used throughout — proven safe on bash 3.2 underpipefail - Router insertion goes immediately before
*)wildcard at line ~608 ofscripts/sw
Two execution options:
1. Subagent-Driven (this session) — I dispatch a fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration with superpowers:subagent-driven-development
2. Parallel Session (separate) — Open a new session in this worktree and use superpowers:executing-plans for batch execution with checkpoints
Which approach would you like?