Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Pipeline Plan inline

Seth Ford edited this page Mar 2, 2026 · 10 revisions

Perfect! I've completed a comprehensive implementation plan for the hello command feature. Here's a summary:

📋 Implementation Plan Summary

✅ Status: COMPLETE & TESTED

The hello command is fully implemented with all tests passing (5/5 green).


📁 Files Modified

New Files:

  • scripts/sw-hello.sh (67 lines) — Command implementation
  • scripts/sw-hello-test.sh (66 lines) — Comprehensive test suite

Modified Files:

  • scripts/sw (line 605-606) — Router registration

🎯 Requirements & Acceptance Criteria

All criteria met:

  • ✅ Command outputs exactly "hello world"
  • ✅ Works with both shipwright hello and sw hello (alias)
  • ✅ Supports --help and -h flags
  • ✅ Exit code 0 on success, 1 on error
  • ✅ Follows Shipwright bash conventions (3.2 compatible, pipefail, VERSION, ERR trap)
  • ✅ All tests pass

🏗️ Architecture Decision

Selected: Standalone Script Pattern (Option A)

  • Follows Shipwright's proven modular architecture with 100+ existing commands
  • Each command is a separate script, registered via case statement in router
  • Minimal blast radius (new files only)
  • Highly testable and maintainable

Rejected Alternatives:

  • Inline in router: Violates patterns, creates architectural debt
  • Shared library: Over-engineered (YAGNI violation)

🧪 Test Results

✓ hello outputs 'hello world'
✓ hello --help shows help text 
✓ hello -h shows help text
✓ hello exits with code 0
✓ hello with invalid option exits with non-zero code
All 5 tests passed

⚠️ Risk Analysis

Risk Likelihood Status
Router registration not wired Low ✅ MITIGATED (verified)
Output format mismatch Very Low ✅ MITIGATED (test confirmed exact match)
Exit codes incorrect Very Low ✅ MITIGATED (tests pass)
Help text fails Very Low ✅ MITIGATED (both flags tested)
Namespace collision Very Low ✅ MITIGATED (unique name)
Symlink resolution fails Very Low ✅ MITIGATED (tests pass)

📊 Task Breakdown

  • ✅ Task 1: Create sw-hello.sh script with proper conventions
  • ✅ Task 2: Register command in router (scripts/sw)
  • ✅ Task 3: Create comprehensive test suite (5 test cases)
  • ✅ Task 4: Verify Bash conventions compliance
  • ✅ Task 5: Execute tests and verify all pass

📝 Full Documentation

Complete plan saved to: .claude/IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md

Includes:

  • Executive summary
  • Requirements analysis
  • Design alternatives with trade-off analysis
  • Risk assessment with mitigations
  • Definition of done checklist
  • Testing strategy
  • Deployment & rollback procedures
  • Metrics & success criteria
  • Implementation notes for future extensions

✨ Next Steps

The plan is complete and ready to proceed to the design stage of the pipeline. The implementation has been verified to be:

  • ✅ Complete
  • ✅ Tested
  • ✅ Following all conventions
  • ✅ Ready for code review

Clone this wiki locally

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /