Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Commit d11dbbb

Browse files
committed
Auto merge of #144244 - jieyouxu:pr-full-ci, r=Kobzol
Enforce that PR CI jobs are a subset of Auto CI jobs modulo carve-outs ### Background Currently, it is possible for a PR with red PR-only CI to pass Auto CI, then all subsequent PR CI runs will be red until that is fixed, even in completely unrelated PRs. For instance, this happened with PR-CI-only Spellcheck (rust-lang/rust#144183). See more discussions at [#t-infra > Spellcheck workflow now fails on all PRs (tree bad?)](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Spellcheck.20workflow.20now.20fails.20on.20all.20PRs.20.28tree.20bad.3F.29/with/529769404). ### CI invariant: PR CI jobs are a subset of Auto CI jobs modulo carve-outs To prevent red PR CI in completely unrelated subsequent PRs and PR CI runs, we need to maintain an invariant that **PR CI jobs are a subset of Auto CI jobs modulo carve-outs**. This is **not** a "strict" subset relationship: some jobs necessarily have to differ under PR CI and Auto CI environments, at least in the current setup. Still, we can try to enforce a weaker "subset modulo carve-outs" relationship between CI jobs and their corresponding Auto jobs. For instance: - `x86_64-gnu-tools` will have `auto`-only env vars like `DEPLOY_TOOLSTATES_JSON: toolstates-linux.json`. - `tidy` will want to `continue_on_error: true` in PR CI to allow for more "useful" compilation errors to also be reported, whereas it should be `continue_on_error: false` in Auto CI to prevent wasting Auto CI resources. The **carve-outs** are: 1. `env` variables. 2. `continue_on_error`. We enforce this invariant through `citool`, so only affects job definitions that are handled by `citool`. Notably, this is not sufficient *alone* to address the CI-only Spellcheck issue (rust-lang/rust#144183). To carry out this enforcement, we modify `citool` to auto-register PR jobs as Auto jobs with `continue_on_error` overridden to `false` **unless** there's an overriding Auto job for the PR job of the same name that only differs by the permitted **carve-outs**. ### Addressing the Spellcheck PR-only CI issue Note that Spellcheck currently does not go through `citool` or `bootstrap`, and is its own GitHub Actions workflow. To actually address the PR-CI-only Spellcheck issue (rust-lang/rust#144183), and carry out the subset-modulo-carve-outs enforcement universally, this PR additionally **removes the current Spellcheck implementation** (a separate GitHub Actions Workflow). That is incompatible with Homu unless we do some hacks in the main CI workflow. This effectively partially reverts rust-lang/rust#134006 (the separate workflow part, not the tidy extra checks component), but is not prejudice against relanding the `typos`-based spellcheck in another implementation that goes through the usual bootstrap CI workflow so that it does work with Homu. The `typos`-based spellcheck seems to have a good false-positive rate. Closes rust-lang/rust#144183. --- r? infra-ci
2 parents ff93b36 + 599ee17 commit d11dbbb

File tree

0 file changed

+0
-0
lines changed

    0 file changed

    +0
    -0
    lines changed

    0 commit comments

    Comments
    (0)

    AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /