Start here: how WorldScript Studio Discussions turn ideas into design and implementation #639

Start here

GitHub Discussions are for exploration and shared context. They do not replace the repository's implementation, security, or acceptance controls.

• Ideas = workflows, alternatives, trade-offs, and early product design.
• General = cross-cutting product and architecture conversation.
• Q&A = factual questions that may receive canonical maintainer answers.
• Show and tell = genuine community workflows and field reports.
• Issues = admitted implementation work, bugs, and acceptance criteria.
• PRs = bounded implementation changes reviewed against the repository gates.

Topic index

Some initial threads contain clearly labeled, maintainer-curated AI-assisted role perspectives. They are design lenses, not separate users, votes, or evidence of community consensus. Genuine replies, reactions, and field reports remain distinct.

Use Discussions for counterexamples, use cases, and product questions. Move reproducible bugs, security findings, and implementation-ready acceptance work to Issues or PRs so they can be tracked and reviewed.

Further design discussions

Routing

Small/early idea → Feature Incubator
Focused product question → dedicated Discussion
Reproducible bug/security/data-loss → Issue
Admitted implementation → Issue
Bounded code change → PR