Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Sign up

Hello, is there anybody out there? #400

Discussion options

Out of curiosity, I wonder... who of you uses something that html2rss provides?

Let's get the discussions started!

Is there anything (you think) which could be improved?
What would be something you'd like to contribute, but had troubles with?
What could html2rss do to improve the UX users have when using RSS?

Dear internet people: I look forward to hearing from you! :-)

You must be logged in to vote

Thanks for saying Hello. :-)

I've locked the topic (reactions are still allowed 👋🏽 ) to prevent a "mega thread" which discusses multiple ideas. Please create a new Discussion for these ideas and keep the board structured.

Replies: 3 comments 3 replies

Comment options

It is such a shame that feedity is not available anymore. I am looking for a (self-hosted) replacement.

  1. OK, can I get this to run without docker?

  2. Is there a place where we can discuss configs for Websites?

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
Comment options

gildesmarais Aug 9, 2024
Maintainer Author

Hey, not sure what happened to feedity. 🤷🏽

  1. Sure, i.e. described in https://github.com/html2rss/html2rss#installation / requires Ruby to be installed in your preferred way.
  2. That place for now would be here. Just open a topic and wait for it to get traction.

Cheers

Comment options

@gildesmarais Wish the instance could load config from external repos.

Say, I've forked the config repo (github.com/mizzunet/html2rss-config) and made some of configs on my own there. Then, let public instance access them. Like https://1.h2r.workers.dev/external/github.com/mizzunet/html2rss-config/cnn/new_stories.rss

Thanks

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
Comment options

gildesmarais Aug 9, 2024
Maintainer Author

Supporting more config repos sounds sensible to. I'm also not quite happy with the cumbersome approach html2rss-configs takes. I'd prefer to just create a yml and would directly profit from automatic testing with rspec. Also taking the yml-files huckepack in a gem doesn't feel that correct.

So, I'm open for other 'registry' approaches. Let's think a bit architecture first before one writes code for it.

However, to manage expectations: "the" public instance will certainly never accept just any "random" config repository. But that should not matter, as everybody can host their own instance and - when they're nice - share it with everyone. :)

Comment options

gildesmarais Aug 21, 2024
Maintainer Author

Added this request to Project Board (view)

Comment options

Thanks for saying Hello. :-)

I've locked the topic (reactions are still allowed 👋🏽 ) to prevent a "mega thread" which discusses multiple ideas. Please create a new Discussion for these ideas and keep the board structured.

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by gildesmarais
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /