|
11 | 11 | 1.2 知识图谱 VS 深度学习 |
12 | 12 | 1.3 知识图谱 VS 关系数据库 VS 传统专家库 |
13 | 13 | 1.4 知识图谱本质和核心价值 |
14 | | -1.5 知识图谱技术体系 |
| 14 | +1.5 知识图谱技术体系 |
15 | 15 | 1.6 典型知识图谱 |
16 | 16 | 1.7 知识图谱应用场景 |
17 | 17 | **课件下载**:[partA](https://github.com/npubird/KnowledgeGraphCourse/blob/master/pub-1知识图谱概论A.pdf) [partB](https://github.com/npubird/KnowledgeGraphCourse/blob/master/pub-1知识图谱概论B.pdf) [partC](https://github.com/npubird/KnowledgeGraphCourse/blob/master/pub-1知识图谱概论C.pdf) |
|
56 | 56 | + 反爬机制应对 |
57 | 57 | 5.2 数据采集实践 |
58 | 58 | + 百科 论坛 社交网络等爬取实践 |
| 59 | +**课件下载**:[partA](https://github.com/npubird/KnowledgeGraphCourse/blob/master/pub-5知识抽取-数据获取.pdf) |
59 | 60 |
|
60 | 61 | ## 第6讲 知识抽取:实体识别(2019年3月29日) |
| 62 | +6.1 实体识别基本概念 |
| 63 | +6.2 基于规则和词典的实体识别方法 |
| 64 | +6.3 基于机器学习的实体识别方法 |
| 65 | +6.4 基于深度学习的实体识别方法 |
| 66 | +6.5 基于半监督学习的实体识别方法 |
| 67 | +6.6 基于迁移学习的实体识别方法 |
| 68 | +6.7 基于预训练的实体识别方法 |
| 69 | +**课件下载**:[partA](https://github.com/npubird/KnowledgeGraphCourse/blob/master/pub-6知识抽取-实体识别.pdf) |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +## 第7讲 知识抽取:关系抽取(2019年4月12日) |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +## 第8讲 知识抽取:事件抽取(2019年3月29日) |
| 75 | +8.1 事件抽取基本概念 |
| 76 | +8.2 基于规则和模板的方法 |
| 77 | +8.3 基于机器学习的方法 |
| 78 | +8.4 基于深度学习的方法 |
| 79 | +8.5 基于知识库的方法 |
| 80 | +8.6 基于强化学习的方法 |
| 81 | +**课件下载**:[partA](https://github.com/npubird/KnowledgeGraphCourse/blob/master/pub-8知识抽取-事件抽取.pdf) |
61 | 82 |
|
62 | 83 | # 附录A:经典文献选读 |
63 | 84 |
|
|
103 | 124 |
|
104 | 125 |
|
105 | 126 | * **事件抽取** |
| 127 | +1. [Chen Y, Xu L, Liu K, et al. Event extraction via dynamic multi-pooling convolutional neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015, 1: 167-176.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P15-1017) |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +[Nguyen T H, Grishman R. Event detection and domain adaptation with convolutional neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers). 2015, 2: 365-371.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P15-2060) |
106 | 130 |
|
| 131 | +[Hogenboom F, Frasincar F, Kaymak U, et al. An overview of event extraction from text[C]//Workshop on Detection, Representation, and Exploitation of Events in the Semantic Web (DeRiVE 2011) at Tenth International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2011). Koblenz, Germany: CEUR‐WS. org, 2011, 779: 48-57.](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.369.7040&rep=rep1&type=pdf) |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +[Narasimhan K, Yala A, Barzilay R. Improving information extraction by acquiring external evidence with reinforcement learning[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.07954, 2016.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.07954.pdf) |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +[Nguyen T H, Cho K, Grishman R. Joint event extraction via recurrent neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2016: 300-309.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N16-1034) |
107 | 136 |
|
108 | 137 | ## 知识融合 |
109 | 138 | 1. Shvaiko P, Euzenat J. [Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges](https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00917910/document). IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 2013, 25(1): 158-176. |
|
185 | 214 | 18. Shi W, Yu Z. [Sentiment Adaptive End-to-End Dialog Systems](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-1140). ACL2018, 1: 1509-1519. |
186 | 215 | 19. Zhang S, Dinan E, Urbanek J, et al. [Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-1205) ACL2018, 1: 2204-2213. |
187 | 216 | 20. Wei Z, Liu Q, Peng B, et al. [Task-oriented dialogue system for automatic diagnosis](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-2033). ACL2018, 2: 201-207. |
188 | | -21. Sungjoon Park, Donghyun Kim and Alice Oh. [Conversation Model Fine-Tuning for Classifying Client Utterances in Counseling Dialogues](). NAACL2019. |
| 217 | +21. Sungjoon Park, Donghyun Kim and Alice Oh. [Conversation Model Fine-Tuning for Classifying Client Utterances in Counseling Dialogues](). NAACL2019. |
| 218 | + |
| 219 | +## 实体识别 |
| 220 | +### ACL |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | +[Parvez M R, Chakraborty S, Ray B, et al. Building language models for text with named entities[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04836, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.04836.pdf) |
| 223 | + |
| 224 | +[Lin Y, Yang S, Stoyanov V, et al. A multi-lingual multi-task architecture for low-resource sequence labeling[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2018, 1: 799-809.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-1074) |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +[Xu H, Liu B, Shu L, et al. Double embeddings and cnn-based sequence labeling for aspect extraction[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04601, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.04601.pdf) |
| 227 | + |
| 228 | +[Ye Z X, Ling Z H. Hybrid semi-markov crf for neural sequence labeling[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.03838, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.03838.pdf) |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | +[Yang J, Zhang Y. Ncrf++: An open-source neural sequence labeling toolkit[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05626, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.05626.pdf) |
| 231 | + |
| 232 | +### NAACL |
| 233 | + |
| 234 | +[Ju M, Miwa M, Ananiadou S. A neural layered model for nested named entity recognition[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 2018, 1: 1446-1459.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N18-1131) |
| 235 | + |
| 236 | +[Wang Z, Qu Y, Chen L, et al. Label-aware double transfer learning for cross-specialty medical named entity recognition[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09021, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.09021.pdf) |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | +[Moon S, Neves L, Carvalho V. Multimodal named entity recognition for short social ../media posts[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07862, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.07862.pdf) |
| 239 | + |
| 240 | +[Katiyar A, Cardie C. Nested named entity recognition revisited[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 2018, 1: 861-871.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N18-1079) |
| 241 | + |
| 242 | +### EMNLP |
| 243 | +[Cao P, Chen Y, Liu K, et al. Adversarial Transfer Learning for Chinese Named Entity Recognition with Self-Attention Mechanism[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2018: 182-192.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D18-1017) |
| 244 | + |
| 245 | +[Xie J, Yang Z, Neubig G, et al. Neural cross-lingual named entity recognition with minimal resources[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.09861, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.09861.pdf) |
| 246 | + |
| 247 | +[Lin B Y, Lu W. Neural adaptation layers for cross-domain named entity recognition[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.06368, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.06368.pdf) |
| 248 | + |
| 249 | +[Shang J, Liu L, Ren X, et al. Learning Named Entity Tagger using Domain-Specific Dictionary[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.03599, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.03599.pdf) |
| 250 | + |
| 251 | +[Greenberg N, Bansal T, Verga P, et al. Marginal Likelihood Training of BiLSTM-CRF for Biomedical Named Entity Recognition from Disjoint Label Sets[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2018: 2824-2829.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D18-1306) |
| 252 | + |
| 253 | +[Sohrab M G, Miwa M. Deep Exhaustive Model for Nested Named Entity Recognition[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2018: 2843-2849.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D18-1309) |
| 254 | + |
| 255 | +[Yu X, Mayhew S, Sammons M, et al. On the Strength of Character Language Models for Multilingual Named Entity Recognition[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.05157, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.05157.pdf) |
| 256 | + |
| 257 | +### COLING |
| 258 | +[Mai K, Pham T H, Nguyen M T, et al. An empirical study on fine-grained named entity recognition[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2018: 711-722.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1060) |
| 259 | + |
| 260 | +[Nagesh A, Surdeanu M. An Exploration of Three Lightly-supervised Representation Learning Approaches for Named Entity Classification[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2018: 2312-2324.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1196) |
| 261 | + |
| 262 | +[Bhutani N, Qian K, Li Y, et al. Exploiting Structure in Representation of Named Entities using Active Learning[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2018: 687-699.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1058) |
| 263 | + |
| 264 | +[Yadav V, Bethard S. A survey on recent advances in named entity recognition from deep learning models[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2018: 2145-2158.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1182) |
| 265 | + |
| 266 | +[Güngör O, Üsküdarlı S, Güngör T. Improving Named Entity Recognition by Jointly Learning to Disambiguate Morphological Tags[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06683, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.06683.pdf) |
| 267 | + |
| 268 | +[Chen L, Moschitti A. Learning to Progressively Recognize New Named Entities with Sequence to Sequence Models[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2018: 2181-2191.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1185) |
| 269 | + |
| 270 | +[Ghaddar A, Langlais P. Robust lexical features for improved neural network named-entity recognition[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03489, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.03489.pdf) |
| 271 | + |
| 272 | + |
| 273 | +## 事件抽取 |
| 274 | +### ACL |
| 275 | +[Choubey P K, Huang R. Improving Event Coreference Resolution by Modeling Correlations between Event Coreference Chains and Document Topic Structures[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2018, 1: 485-495.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-1045) |
| 276 | + |
| 277 | +[Lin H, Lu Y, Han X, et al. Nugget Proposal Networks for Chinese Event Detection[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00249, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.00249.pdf) |
| 278 | + |
| 279 | +[Huang L, Ji H, Cho K, et al. Zero-shot transfer learning for event extraction[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01066, 2017.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01066.pdf) |
| 280 | + |
| 281 | +[Hong Y, Zhou W, Zhang J, et al. Self-regulation: Employing a Generative Adversarial Network to Improve Event Detection[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2018, 1: 515-526.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-1048) |
| 282 | + |
| 283 | +[Zhao Y, Jin X, Wang Y, et al. Document embedding enhanced event detection with hierarchical and supervised attention[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers). 2018, 2: 414-419.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-2066) |
| 284 | + |
| 285 | +[Yang H, Chen Y, Liu K, et al. DCFEE: A Document-level Chinese Financial Event Extraction System based on Automatically Labeled Training Data[J]. Proceedings of ACL 2018, System Demonstrations, 2018: 50-55.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-4009) |
| 286 | + |
| 287 | +### NAACL |
| 288 | +[Ferguson J, Lockard C, Weld D S, et al. Semi-Supervised Event Extraction with Paraphrase Clusters[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.08622, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.08622.pdf) |
| 289 | + |
| 290 | +### EMNLP |
| 291 | +[Orr J W, Tadepalli P, Fern X. Event Detection with Neural Networks: A Rigorous Empirical Evaluation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.08504, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.08504.pdf) |
| 292 | + |
| 293 | +[Liu S, Cheng R, Yu X, et al. Exploiting Contextual Information via Dynamic Memory Network for Event Detection[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.03449, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.03449.pdf) |
| 294 | + |
| 295 | +[Liu X, Luo Z, Huang H. Jointly multiple events extraction via attention-based graph information aggregation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.09078, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.09078.pdf) |
| 296 | + |
| 297 | +[Chen Y, Yang H, Liu K, et al. Collective Event Detection via a Hierarchical and Bias Tagging Networks with Gated Multi-level Attention Mechanisms[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2018: 1267-1276.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D18-1158) |
| 298 | + |
| 299 | +[Lu W, Nguyen T H. Similar but not the Same: Word Sense Disambiguation Improves Event Detection via Neural Representation Matching[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2018: 4822-4828.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D18-1517) |
| 300 | + |
| 301 | +### COLING |
| 302 | +[Araki J, Mitamura T. Open-Domain Event Detection using Distant Supervision[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2018: 878-891.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1075) |
| 303 | + |
| 304 | +[Muis A O, Otani N, Vyas N, et al. Low-resource Cross-lingual Event Type Detection via Distant Supervision with Minimal Effort[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2018: 70-82.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1007) |
| 305 | + |
| 306 | +[Kazeminejad G, Bonial C, Brown S W, et al. Automatically Extracting Qualia Relations for the Rich Event Ontology[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2018: 2644-2652.](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1224) |
| 307 | + |
| 308 | +[Liu Z, Mitamura T, Hovy E. Graph-Based Decoding for Event Sequencing and Coreference Resolution[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05099, 2018.](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.05099.pdf) |
| 309 | + |
| 310 | + |
189 | 311 |
|
190 | 312 |
|
191 | 313 |
|
|
0 commit comments