-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
-
Is there a simple way to create an order type that will simulate a "fill price" based on average prices in the future? eg. TWAP (time weighted average price) VWAP (volume weighted average price). I was thinking about an instance variable in Order like 'limit' or 'stop' in the meantime, I was thinking I might modify the data creating additional columns VWAP and TWAP in addition to {open, high, low, close}. VWAP and TWAP would contain future information for trade purposes but not for signal purposes.
The justification is obviously to simulate more real world hypotheticals. If managing meaningful capital, orders would need to be spread out over time and volume once the signal recommends a trade.
I realize this is meant to be a lightweight simple to use package, so maybe this is too much to think of from a feature perspective, but perhaps there is a simple work around that I can put together as an example for the docs.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I might modify the data creating additional columns VWAP and TWAP in addition to {open, high, low, close}
This is the supported and recommended approach. Anything you pass in as data will be available the same way as computed indicators and OHLC price points are.
You may then save the computed statistics (and such, whatever you're after) into an object and process it after backtest run.
For rolling VWAP, I'd do:
class Example(Strategy): def init(self): df = self.data.df def VWAP(prices, volume, n): return (prices * volume).rolling(n).sum() / volume.rolling(n).sum() self.vwap = self.I(VWAP, df.Close, df.Volume, 20) ...
Have it plotted and all.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Is there a simple way to create an order type that will simulate a "fill price"
On second read, I don't quite get it ...
If managing meaningful capital, orders would need to be spread out over time and volume once the signal recommends a trade.
Why not just place multiple orders? 🤨 Something like:
signal = signal.rolling(n).max() # spread the signal to n bars order_size = order_size / n
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
I think this answered my questions but I haven't marked it as answered yet, because I haven't had a chance to play with it and wanted to try it so I can understand it. I'm sure you are right, and I'm just being dense but, I just don't understand how what you wrote looks at the future not the past. Reading your responses here it seems to me that you are looking at the previous n bars of the data, but I wan't my orders to be based on the future which the next() function doesn't know yet. Is it possible that my lack of understanding comes from not using the SignalStrategy class yet? My questions were for the base Strategy class.
Like I said, I haven't had a chance to roll up my sleeves yet to dig in. I'm sure I'll solve my own ignorance once I tinker with your answer. I just didn't want you to think that your answer wasn't appreciated so I chimed in here.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Yeah, what I meant with the snippet above is that you ought to spread the "signal" to several consecutive bars and have orders executed at each, either via SignalStrategy or plain if self.signal: self.buy(...). This way, your average price / trade performance will reflect the average price / dynamics of the market.
If that's not it, and if passing extra data columns doesn't help, I guess I might not have understood your intent completely. What's an example of pseudocode you'd ideally expect?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
👍 1