Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fork into a more active repo? #1106

JustinGuese started this conversation in Polls
Discussion options

sadly it seems abandoned, but I see a lot of PRs as well, and think it has a nice potential if we would add some more features... so what do you think about forking it into a new open source project where we have more admins? @kernc if you read this I'd be open to your opinion ;)
An alternative would be if kernc adds more people to it such we can manage PRs

Everyone that would be willing to add code please write a comment in the docs ;)

Fork into a new repo with more participants
Fork into new repo
20%
Stay with this one, requires reply or participation by kernc
80%

10 votes

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 3 comments 3 replies

Comment options

whichever is good for me, the point is keeping it alive and evolving - I am not so much of a potential contributor, but for sure an heavy user....

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
Comment options

Need more hands on deck to update a lot of the stuff then... anything that allows this to grow is a good idea

Comment options

Fwiw, this repo will be brought up to speed shortly. Without pointing any hands, the remaining and particularly disconcerting issue is the apparent dormancy of the excellent but defunct scikit-optimize project, a soft dependency of ours. In particular, I'm not yet wholly decided how, if, to replace it ...

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
Comment options

A different interface but well maintained & documented ; https://github.com/uqfoundation/mystic

Comment options

Thanks for the note man, would like to get my hands on this and play with it. Also a competitor of VectorBT is always appreciated

Comment options

Inactivity is always the biggest concern for me for any repos no matter how popular it was. I am not expecting some big features, but some small improvements/bug fixes can already be very helpful. I see some PRs are small changes and are actually helpful, any chance to get those PR reviewed?

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /