Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Sign up
Appearance settings

Commit c2f959c

Browse files
removing useless git LFS
1 parent dc123c5 commit c2f959c

File tree

481 files changed

+1884181
-0
lines changed

Some content is hidden

Large Commits have some content hidden by default. Use the searchbox below for content that may be hidden.

481 files changed

+1884181
-0
lines changed

‎bonus content/effective data visualization/Bonus - Effective Multi-dimensional Data Visualization.ipynb

Lines changed: 2034 additions & 0 deletions
Large diffs are not rendered by default.

‎bonus content/effective data visualization/winequality-red.csv

Lines changed: 1600 additions & 0 deletions
Large diffs are not rendered by default.

‎bonus content/effective data visualization/winequality-white.csv

Lines changed: 4899 additions & 0 deletions
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Lines changed: 72 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
1+
Citation Request:
2+
This dataset is public available for research. The details are described in [Cortez et al., 2009].
3+
Please include this citation if you plan to use this database:
4+
5+
P. Cortez, A. Cerdeira, F. Almeida, T. Matos and J. Reis.
6+
Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties.
7+
In Decision Support Systems, Elsevier, 47(4):547-553. ISSN: 0167-9236.
8+
9+
Available at: [@Elsevier] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009年05月01日6
10+
[Pre-press (pdf)] http://www3.dsi.uminho.pt/pcortez/winequality09.pdf
11+
[bib] http://www3.dsi.uminho.pt/pcortez/dss09.bib
12+
13+
1. Title: Wine Quality
14+
15+
2. Sources
16+
Created by: Paulo Cortez (Univ. Minho), Antonio Cerdeira, Fernando Almeida, Telmo Matos and Jose Reis (CVRVV) @ 2009
17+
18+
3. Past Usage:
19+
20+
P. Cortez, A. Cerdeira, F. Almeida, T. Matos and J. Reis.
21+
Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties.
22+
In Decision Support Systems, Elsevier, 47(4):547-553. ISSN: 0167-9236.
23+
24+
In the above reference, two datasets were created, using red and white wine samples.
25+
The inputs include objective tests (e.g. PH values) and the output is based on sensory data
26+
(median of at least 3 evaluations made by wine experts). Each expert graded the wine quality
27+
between 0 (very bad) and 10 (very excellent). Several data mining methods were applied to model
28+
these datasets under a regression approach. The support vector machine model achieved the
29+
best results. Several metrics were computed: MAD, confusion matrix for a fixed error tolerance (T),
30+
etc. Also, we plot the relative importances of the input variables (as measured by a sensitivity
31+
analysis procedure).
32+
33+
4. Relevant Information:
34+
35+
The two datasets are related to red and white variants of the Portuguese "Vinho Verde" wine.
36+
For more details, consult: http://www.vinhoverde.pt/en/ or the reference [Cortez et al., 2009].
37+
Due to privacy and logistic issues, only physicochemical (inputs) and sensory (the output) variables
38+
are available (e.g. there is no data about grape types, wine brand, wine selling price, etc.).
39+
40+
These datasets can be viewed as classification or regression tasks.
41+
The classes are ordered and not balanced (e.g. there are munch more normal wines than
42+
excellent or poor ones). Outlier detection algorithms could be used to detect the few excellent
43+
or poor wines. Also, we are not sure if all input variables are relevant. So
44+
it could be interesting to test feature selection methods.
45+
46+
5. Number of Instances: red wine - 1599; white wine - 4898.
47+
48+
6. Number of Attributes: 11 + output attribute
49+
50+
Note: several of the attributes may be correlated, thus it makes sense to apply some sort of
51+
feature selection.
52+
53+
7. Attribute information:
54+
55+
For more information, read [Cortez et al., 2009].
56+
57+
Input variables (based on physicochemical tests):
58+
1 - fixed acidity
59+
2 - volatile acidity
60+
3 - citric acid
61+
4 - residual sugar
62+
5 - chlorides
63+
6 - free sulfur dioxide
64+
7 - total sulfur dioxide
65+
8 - density
66+
9 - pH
67+
10 - sulphates
68+
11 - alcohol
69+
Output variable (based on sensory data):
70+
12 - quality (score between 0 and 10)
71+
72+
8. Missing Attribute Values: None

0 commit comments

Comments
(0)

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /