|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +language: en |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +early_access: true |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +reviews: |
| 7 | + request_changes_workflow: false |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | + high_level_summary: true |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | + poem: false |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | + review_status: true |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | + collapse_walkthrough: true |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | + path_filters: |
| 18 | + - wg_utilities/**/*.py |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | + path_instructions: |
| 21 | + - path: wg_utilities/**/*.py |
| 22 | + instructions: >- |
| 23 | + Review the Python code against the PEP 8 style guide. Highlight any deviations, |
| 24 | + including issues with variable names, function naming conventions, line length, |
| 25 | + and use of spaces vs. tabs. Ensure the use of docstrings for functions and |
| 26 | + classes. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + Additionally, evaluate the Python code for functional efficiency and |
| 29 | + optimization. Identify areas where the implementation could be improved, such |
| 30 | + as suboptimal use of variables/memory, inefficient input/output operations, or |
| 31 | + any other aspects that could hinder performance. Assess the clarity and |
| 32 | + appropriateness of variable and function names in the context of their roles |
| 33 | + within the code. Examine for potential logical errors or parts of the code that |
| 34 | + might lead to unexpected behavior. Suggestions for enhancing the code's |
| 35 | + efficiency and maintainability are highly encouraged. |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | + auto_review: |
| 38 | + enabled: true |
| 39 | + drafts: false |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +chat: |
| 42 | + auto_reply: true |
0 commit comments