Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Implementation description #47

Open
Labels
@fare

Description

Environment is better than "system", but I would still say "implementation".
Traditionally by "environment", one includes Emacs + SLIME + entire toolchain.

Descriptions are off.

I would qualify SBCL as "Highest speed. Great on Linux, Good on OSX, passable on Windows". The compiler itself is the slowest. It's the code it produces that's fast.

For CCL, I'd write "High speed code. Great on Linux, OSX, Windows. Commercial support."

For CLISP, I'd write "Most compact code. Most portable. A bit quaint. Not actively maintained." Base: bytecode.

For LW and Allegro, I'd write "High speed. Great on Linux, OSX, Windows. Proprietary platform."

Or I'd make a grid for how fast the code is, how well each OS is supported, whether it's free software, whether there's commercial support.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

        AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /