Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Sign up

How much do you think lack of aggregate support affects your TPC-DS results? #197

Unanswered
j-baker asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

I'm seeing the TPC-DS results ending up at about 70% of prior runtime with most queries being somewhat improved with Blaze, but aggregate operators aren't presently supported. Given most of the TPC-DS queries do use aggregates and you're obviously aware of this, do you have any inclinations of how the absence of them might be affecting runtime (via e.g. stage durations, etc).

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

I apologize for the delayed response to your question. As you mentioned, aggregate operators are currently not supported in Blaze, which may be affecting overall runtime for TPC-DS queries.

However, I do have good news to share. Since you asked this question, we have added support for aggregate operators in Blaze! This should improve the performance of TPC-DS queries and other workloads that rely on aggregate operations.

We are actively working to maintain community and will be releasing updates and new code soon.

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
Comment options

Has a new benchmark been run since adding aggregate operators?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /