Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Do we need a check for concentrations of similar edits? #493

Open
Assignees
Labels
enhancementNew feature or request

Description

In the January data a colleague noticed a large spike in water point features around the coast of Greenland. She checked OSM but didn't see anything new added in that area. I looked into it further and found that someone had performed an unauthorized import at some point before the release, which was then reverted after the January release:

orange=new in January, white=existing
Image

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177975060#map=4/75.34/-47.29

Is this something we should check for? It could help identify instances where bad/unauthorized edits were made that aren't necessarily vandalism. While the presence of the data in the January release isn't concerning on it's own, the fact that those points will disappear from our basemap in the next update makes for a confusing user experience, especially since it's not very apparent what happened if you just go look at OSM.

This is admittedly an edge case. For the most part we'd essentially be checking for unauthorized imports in OSM that were either not caught by OSM or were not caught in time before an Overture release. In this case it looks like there was a few weeks lag between the import and it being reverted.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Type

No fields configured for Feature.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /