The screener is the surface, but the thing behind it is a snapshot pipeline — 10.8M+ rows across 13,963 markets, refreshed daily. I want to ask people who actually backtest prediction-market strategies what fields they keep wishing were there.

What the snapshots currently capture (per market per refresh):

• price (yes-side mid)
• volume cumulative + volume_24h
• liquidity (Gamma's number, not orderbook-derived)
• one_day_change, one_hour_change, one_week_change
• closed, archived, active flags
• end_date, category, tags
• outcome_prices (full multi-outcome where applicable)

What I know is missing and have not (yet) added:

1. Order-book depth at multiple levels. Currently zero. Would need to hit CLOB per market, expensive at 13k markets but maybe doable for a curated top-N by liquidity.
2. Trade-by-trade tape. Not snapshotted — only aggregated volumes. Without the tape you can't reconstruct VWAP or detect single-fill spikes.
3. Resolution outcome + timestamp for closed markets. We have closed=true but not always the resolved outcome cleanly joined back to the historical snapshots, so survival-bias-aware backtests are awkward.
4. News/event tagging. Markets that moved 20% in an hour — was there a tweet, a court ruling, an earnings print? Currently zero linkage.
5. Funding-rate / borrow analogues. Polymarket doesn't have these, but the cost-of-carry equivalent (capital lockup until resolution) is computable from end_date + price and we don't expose it as a field.

Question for anyone running models on prediction-market data:

• Which of (1)–(5) would change what you can backtest vs just being nice-to-have?
• Is there a 6th thing I'm not listing that you've had to scrape yourself?
• If you could only add one field per snapshot row, what would it be?

The full historical pull (SQLite + CSV) is on Gumroad — 9,ドル freely redistributable for research. The screener stays free. Answers here genuinely shape what the next refresh adds, so be specific.

Methodology background on the existing crash-signal column lives in Discussion #2 if useful context.