Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Sign up

Intel performance libraries #226

Answered by nicgowans
L-Curr0 asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

Hi everyone,
Noting the use of Intel's performance libraries in the software licence - has there been any reported or perceived, compatibility issues or performance degradation when using AMD CPUs?
Thanks, Liam.

You must be logged in to vote

Hi Liam,

In some AWS testing I did a couple years ago, I found DynAdjust v1.2.3 performed around 2.5 x faster per iteration on a 2.3 GHz Intel Xeon E7-8880 v3 processor compared against a 2.5 GHz AMD EPYC 7000.

In terms of actual iteration times, it was ~1.35 hours on the Intel processor vs ~3.4 hours on the AMD.

Didn't run into any compatibility issues.

Nic

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

Hi Liam,

In some AWS testing I did a couple years ago, I found DynAdjust v1.2.3 performed around 2.5 x faster per iteration on a 2.3 GHz Intel Xeon E7-8880 v3 processor compared against a 2.5 GHz AMD EPYC 7000.

In terms of actual iteration times, it was ~1.35 hours on the Intel processor vs ~3.4 hours on the AMD.

Didn't run into any compatibility issues.

Nic

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
Comment options

Thanks Nic, certainly useful info, depending on use case etc.

Answer selected by L-Curr0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /