-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
Welcome to the Dashlane CLI discussions! #123
👋 Welcome!
We’re using Discussions as a place to connect with other members of our community. We hope that you:
- Ask questions you’re wondering about.
- Share ideas.
- Get help on your projects using the Dashlane CLI.
- Engage with other community members.
- Welcome others and are open-minded. Remember that this is a community we
build together 💪.
To get started, comment below with an introduction of yourself and tell us about what you do with this community.
If you need support related to other Dashlane apps or your own account, please go to our Dashlane Help Center!
All reactions
-
🎉 3 -
❤️ 4 -
🚀 3
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
Hey 👋, thanks @Mikescops for the post, it's a great idea. To present myself rapidly, I am the author of Alfred-Dashlane that is built on top of the cli. This workflow is working in Alfred, a productivity app for Mac users.
I have some ideas that I'd like to share:
- I hope to see Dashlane-cli officially integrated into Homebrew core one day in order to distribute it more easily.
- Having the possibility to modify add or even delete a password / otp / note could be a good evolution !
- Having the possibility to add multiple vaults
Happy to discuss with you ! 😉
All reactions
-
❤️ 1
Thanks for sharing! Nice work, I'll give it a try 😃
- We now have a dedicated homebrew tap which makes it much easier to get updates on your side :
brew install dashlane/tap/dashlane-cli - Write operations on vault are definitely the way to go, tho' it requires much more work and maintenance, we'll get there
- Yes, I'm looking for that too, you can open an issue for it 👍
All reactions
-
❤️ 1
Thanks for the response @Mikescops ! Don't hesitate to share your feedbacks and expertise regarding the Alfred project.
Concerning the tap, it's great but as mentioned here it requires Xcode to build the binary which doesn't help me to distribute the workflow.
It's just something I wish for the future ! But it's already nice to have this solution.
All reactions
-
👍 1
Ah yes good catch, I'll try to figure out how to skip this requirement, so far it's mandatory as it used to self sign the final package so your kernel does not reject the binary.
All reactions
-
👍 1
The --build-from-source flag is still working but not ideal. That's the solution I chose in my project.
All reactions
-
🚀 1