In
020235a5754 I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums to
allow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch the
corresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purpose
of wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well.
It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit for
autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, even
before
020235a5754.
Discussion: 26377.
1443105453@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch
index d817eba61bb1b205d5911bddded6f3c3117cba83..931dceb697b2cdb364211ec3e21bf59ea9ca325f 100644 (file)
RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST,
ShareUpdateExclusiveLock
},
- -1, 100000000, 2000000000
+ -1, 100000, 2000000000
},
{
{
RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST,
ShareUpdateExclusiveLock
},
- -1, 100000000, 2000000000
+ -1, 10000, 2000000000
},
{
{