Almost successfull compiling GCJ, however..

Fri Mar 9 02:32:00 GMT 2012

I have gone through all of this, and found no problems.
gen-fib doesn't seem to be a command that runs from prompt.
Furthermore, I have gotten rid of the gen-fib.h file,
and have exactly the same issue as outlined previously (here).
Is there anyone who can get me further past these errors?
> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:59:12 +0000
> Subject: Re: Almost successfull compiling GCJ, however..
> From: dnpaterson@gmail.com
> To: stargate7thsymbol@live.co.uk
> CC: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
>> On 8 March 2012 08:18, Me Myself and I <stargate7thsymbol@live.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > When I remove fib_table.h,
> >
> > and attempt to make; again inside objdir/
> >
> > I get exactly the same error message as before, just earlier on:
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > fib2_ui.c:76:29: error: 'FIB_TABLE_LIMIT' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > fib2_ui.c:76:29: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > make[5] *** [fib2_ui.lo] Error 1
> > make[5] Leaving directory '/home/User/gcc-4.6.2/objdir/gmp/mpn'
> > make[4] ***all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[4] Leaving directory '/home/User/gcc-4.6.2/objdir/gmp'
> > make[3] *** [all] Error 2
> > make[3] Leaving directory '/home/User/gcc-4.6.2/objdir/gmp'
> > make[2] *** [all-stage1-gmp] Error 2
> > make[2] Leaving directory '/home/User/gcc-4.6.2/objdir'
> > make[1] *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
> > make[1] Leaving directory '/home/User/gcc-4.6.2/objdir'
> > make: *** [all] Error 2
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> It's been suggested already, but I can't see where you confirmed you'd
> done it - have you tried deleting your
> source directory and re-un-zipping the original source before you do anything?
>> It's possible you have some corruption of the source tree caused by
> running configure within it previously.
>> And please copy and paste the commands and the output after doing
> this, as it looks like you're re-copying
> output messages from old emails, not from your latest attempts.
>> David P.