[patch] C6X unwinding/exception handling
Andrew Haley
aph@redhat.com
Mon Oct 17 11:21:00 GMT 2011
On 10/17/2011 12:01 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 02:23 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
>>> Index: libjava/exception.cc
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- libjava/exception.cc (revision 179739)
>>> +++ libjava/exception.cc (working copy)
>>> @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@
>>> {
>>> _Unwind_Ptr Start;
>>> _Unwind_Ptr LPStart;
>>> + _Unwind_Ptr ttype_base;
>>> const unsigned char *TType;
>>> const unsigned char *action_table;
>>> unsigned char ttype_encoding;
>>> @@ -184,7 +185,7 @@
>>> _Unwind_Ptr ptr;
>>>>>> ptr = (_Unwind_Ptr) (info->TType - (i * 4));
>>> - ptr = _Unwind_decode_target2(ptr);
>>> + ptr = _Unwind_decode_typeinfo_ptr (info->ttype_base, (_Unwind_Word)
>>> ptr);
>>>>>> return reinterpret_cast<void **>(ptr);
>>> }
>>> @@ -325,6 +326,7 @@
>>>>>> // Parse the LSDA header.
>>> p = parse_lsda_header (context, language_specific_data, &info);
>>> + info.ttype_base = base_of_encoded_value (info.ttype_encoding, context);
>>> #ifdef HAVE_GETIPINFO
>>> ip = _Unwind_GetIPInfo (context, &ip_before_insn);
>>> #else
>>>> No. The purpose of my patch was to remove the arm specific code.
>>>> The only difference I can see in this bit of code is that libstdc++ uses
>> base_of_encoded_value/read_encoded_value_with_base whereas libjava uses
>> context/read_encoded_value.
>>>> I expect you want something like the patch below (completely untested).
>> I checked the attached patch, test results at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-10/msg01377.html
>> which are the same as with my suggested patch.
>> Ok for the trunk?
OK. One question: where is_GLIBCXX_OVERRIDE_TTYPE_ENCODING defined?
Andrew.
More information about the Java
mailing list