gcj segfaults on i686/x86_64-apple-darwin*

Andrew Haley aph@redhat.com
Mon Nov 9 16:28:00 GMT 2009


Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:33:11PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>>> Shouldn't the libjava testsuite contain some rudimentary tests using gcj
>>> to make sure it is functional?
>> Sure.
>>>>> The recent testsuite results don't suggest
>>> major problems with java on intel darwin...
>>>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg00666.html
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-10/msg01308.html
>> This means that, whatever the cause of the bug, it wasn't present
>> when these tests were run.
>>>> You can easily verify that yourself by running 'make check-target-libjava'.
>>>> Andrew.
>> Andrew,
> What exactly would I need to add to...
>> public class testme {
> public static void main(String args[]){
> System.out.println("Hello");
> }
> }
>> to convert it into a libjava compilation/execution test case for gcj?

you need to add one file, testme.out, which contains the expected
output from testme. Put both files in libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang.
> It might be simplier to just try to run such a test case from within
> the libjava dejagnu harness to verify that the issue doesn't exist
> within it. I was considering something like...
>> gcj --main=testme -O pr41991.java
>> for the compilation and a scan for Hello on the output of the
> execution run. Thanks in advance for any hints on where to place
> such a test within the libjava dejagnu tests and what header
> entries to add.

I find it very hard to believe that the rest of the tests would pass
while Hello, world fails.
Andrew.


More information about the Java mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /