GCJ Stack Traces for arm-wince-pe on gcj 3.4.3

Wed Jan 28 16:38:00 GMT 2009

Craig Vanderborgh wrote:
>> I am still pretty fuzzy on what code generation options should be used
> to generate stack frames that could be unwound. The things I have
> tried so far (such as -mapcs-32) have not resulted in stack frames
> that I could unwind. Any suggestions on what the right compiler
> options might be?

I would have expected that to work. Strict APCS compliance requires
an unwindable stack chain. What's wrong?
> Our applications are almost entirely AOT-compiled to native
> arm-wince-pe objects. So I could potentially look up and display
> functions from the linked part of the application in my stack trace,
> right? That would be much better than nothing and would be a workable
> solution for the near term.

Sure.
Andrew.